Proposition 22: Uber, Lyft drivers sue to overturn ballot measure

By BRIAN MELLEY|The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — Chauffeurs for app-based ride-hailing and also shipment services submitted a suit Tuesday to rescind a The golden state ballot initiative that makes them independent professionals as opposed to staff members qualified for advantages and task securities.

The claim submitted with the California High court stated Proposition 22 is unconstitutional because it limits the power of the Legislature to give workers the right to organize and also omits vehicle drivers from being eligible for employees’ compensation.

The step, which was passed in November with 58% support, was one of the most pricey in state history with Uber, Lyft and other solutions pouring $200 million on behalf of it. Organized labor, that signed up with vehicle drivers in the suit, invested about $20 million to challenge it.

“Prop. 22 doesn’t just fail our state rideshare drivers, it falls short the standard examination of following our state constitution,” claimed Bob Schoonover of the SEIU union. “The law as composed by Uber and Lyft rejects drivers legal rights under the legislation in The golden state and makes it nearly difficult for legislators to fix these issues.”

When the tally action passed, fans claimed voters had revealed they wanted to maintain the system that permitted drivers adaptability to establish their own hours. Opponents said the companies had bought their very own regulation and vowed to keep fighting.

The suit is the most recent round in the high-stakes fight in between labor and the titans of the gig economy, all based in San Francisco.

Recommendation 22 was composed by Uber and Lyft as well as supported by DoorDash, Postmates and also Instacart to test spots labor legislation AB5 gone by Democrats in 2019. It expanded a California High court ruling that restricted businesses from identifying certain employees as independent specialists.

The procedure gave the delivery solutions an exception from the regulation that would certainly have called for giving drivers with defenses like minimal wage, overtime, medical insurance and reimbursement for costs.

Under the procedure, chauffeurs stay independent specialists exempt from mandates such as sick leave and expense reimbursement yet would certainly receive some “alternate advantages,” including a guaranteed minimum wage and also subsidies for health and wellness insurance policy if they balance 25 hours of job a week.

Messages looking for comment from Uber and Lyft were not immediately returned.

Leave a Reply